Skip to main content

Your AI tool,
validated by humans.

Built an internal tool with AI? Your team shipping solutions without a technical framework? Before any deployment, our pairs of senior developers read your code and identify exactly what could cost you.

AI code moves fast.
Until the day it doesn't.

Nearly half of all code produced today is written with the help of AI. Non-technical founders ship working prototypes in hours, where it used to take weeks. The movement is real, the gains are concrete, and no one is going back. What the demos don't show is what happens next.

45%
of AI code contains security vulnerabilities
Veracode, 2025 GenAI Code Security Report
2,74×
more vulnerabilities than human-written code
Veracode, 2025 GenAI Code Security Report
4/10
projects would encounter critical failures in production on auth, payments or load
MV Studio field experience
70%
of AI prototypes would require partial or complete rewriting at scale
MV Studio field experience

This isn't an AI problem. It's a supervision problem. ValidAI exists precisely to bridge the gap between a tool that runs and a tool that holds up.

Developers who work with AI.
Not for it.

We know AI's blind spots because we encounter them in production.

We're not an AI that generates reports. We're a development agency with years of experience in production, security and architecture, who have learned to work with AI tools by understanding precisely their limitations.

When we audit your code, we actually read it. We annotate it, analyse it, understand it. And if you have an incident six months from now, we can find exactly why.

Sarah
Sarah
Backend Performance
Arno
Arno
Frontend Accessibility
Jonathan
Jonathan
Backend Performance Architecture DevOps
Elodie
Elodie
Testing Frontend Accessibility
Jean-François
Jean-François
Project management Client follow-up

Two steps.
An actionable roadmap on the way out.

01
From €3,500
Full audit by humans
A pair of senior developers goes through your code in detail. 18 scored and justified criteria, full report with code extracts, prioritised remediation roadmap. Delivered in under 2 weeks.
02
On quote · Optional
Remediation support
We take care of the identified fixes: security, refactoring, test implementation. Directly aligned with the delivered roadmap, without having to re-explain everything.

AI codes fast.
Not necessarily well.

Cursor, Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude Code produce functional code in minutes. What they don't do: secure your access, comply with GDPR, think long-term architecture. These gaps are systematic and exponentially more costly to fix once in production.

01
Security
Insufficient authentication, hardcoded secrets, missing input validation, vulnerable dependencies.
02
GDPR
Data over-collection, verbose logs containing personal data, no retention policy.
03
Architecture
Monolithic code, massive duplication, no separation of concerns between modules.
04
Scalability
N+1 queries, no caching, no load management. The tool holds at 5 users, not at 500.
05
Maintainability
Zero tests, no documentation, unusable git history. Takeover cost multiplied by 3 to 5.

An objective score,
not an opinion.

18 criteria scored from 0 to 4 across 5 weighted areas. Each score is justified with a concrete example from the code.

01 25%
Security
  • Authentication & authorisation
  • Injections & XSS
  • Secrets management
  • Vulnerable dependencies
02 20%
GDPR & data
  • Data minimisation
  • Storage & retention
  • Consent & rights
  • Logs & traceability
03 25%
Architecture & quality
  • Structure & organisation
  • Duplication & debt
  • Error handling
  • Config & environments
04 15%
Scalability & performance
  • Database queries
  • Caching strategy
  • Load resilience
05 15%
Maintainability & docs
  • Technical documentation
  • Testing
  • Versioning & history

Fixed price.
No surprises.

The audit is fixed-price, remediation is custom-quoted. You know exactly what you're signing up for before you sign.

Remediation support
On quote
Based on the audit roadmap
  • Fixing identified vulnerabilities
  • Targeted architectural refactoring
  • Automated test implementation
  • Effort estimate per action
  • 3-month follow-up available (+€500)
Contact us

Actionable on the way out.

Every audit ends with a prioritised roadmap with effort estimates. Not a vague narrative report.

Score out of 100
Overall score broken down across 5 weighted areas, with 18 individually scored and justified criteria.
Full report
Context, score summary, per-area detail with code extracts, prioritised recommendations. Delivered in Word + PDF.
Prioritised roadmap
Actions ranked Critical / Major / Minor with effort estimates. Know what to fix first and why.
Debriefing session
Session included in the audit to present the report, answer questions and define next steps.

Five steps.
Your teams stay focused.

From the scoping call to the delivered report, the process is designed to demand as little as possible from your teams.

01
Scoping call
A 30-minute call to understand your tool, your stack and your context. Quote sent within 24h. Free, no commitment.
02
NDA & Quote
Quote + T&Cs. Signature + 50% deposit. Code access via private Git repository. Systematic NDA.
03
Audit
A pair of senior developers goes through your code in detail: 18-criteria analysis grid, observations with code extracts, report writing.
04
Delivery
Word + PDF report. Debriefing session if included. 50% balance on receipt.
05
Optional follow-up
Remediation handled by MV Studio, or a 3-month follow-up session to review correction progress (+€500). Your choice, at your own pace.

30 minutes.
We'll see if we can help.

Jean-François
Jean-François
Project management & client follow-up

Fill in this form. We'll get back to you within 24h for a free scoping call and propose the audit level suited to your project.

Free scoping call (~30 min)
Quote sent within 24h after the call
NDA signed before any code access
No commitment at this stage
Request an audit

Response within 24h · No commitment · Confidential

Request received!

We'll get back to you within 24h to schedule the scoping call.
In the meantime, a confirmation email has been sent to you.

Everything you want
to know before getting started.

Answers to the most common questions about AI code auditing, our method and how we work.

An AI code audit is a structured analysis of software built with AI tools such as Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT or Claude Code. ValidAI evaluates the code across 18 criteria in 5 weighted areas: security, GDPR, architecture, scalability and maintainability. Each criterion is scored and justified with a concrete example from the code. The goal is to identify real risks before production deployment or handover to a technical team.
AI tools generate functional code quickly — but systematically ignore certain critical aspects: authentication security, GDPR compliance, maintainable architecture, load resilience. A tool that works in development can have serious flaws in production or become impossible to maintain after 6 months. The ValidAI audit objectifies these risks and corrects them before they become incidents or irreversible technical debt.
Recurring issues in AI code: security flaws (insufficient authentication, secrets hardcoded in the code, missing input validation), GDPR violations (personal data over-collection, verbose logs containing sensitive data, no retention policy), fragile architecture (monolithic code, massive duplication, tight coupling between modules), scalability problems (N+1 database queries, no caching, no load management) and zero maintainability (no automated tests, absent documentation, unusable git history).
The ValidAI code audit is fixed-price, starting from €3,500. The exact rate is set during the free 30-minute scoping call, based on project size, complexity and your context. A fixed quote is sent within 24 hours. Remediation (fixing identified issues) is quoted separately, based directly on the delivered roadmap.
Delivery is under 2 weeks in all cases, from receipt of repository access. If your project has a critical deadline, flag it during the scoping call — we adapt the schedule where possible.
Yes, a confidentiality agreement (NDA) is signed systematically before any access to the code repository. Access is exclusively via a securely shared private Git repository — no source code is transmitted by email or any other unsecured channel. The NDA is signed after the quote is accepted and a 50% deposit is paid. Confidentiality is absolute and contractually guaranteed.
The full audit is an in-depth analysis by a pair of senior developers: 18 scored and justified criteria with code extracts, Word + PDF report, prioritised remediation roadmap and debriefing session included. From €3,500, rate defined during the scoping call. Remediation support is an optional step following the audit: MV Studio takes care of fixing the identified issues (security, refactoring, testing). Quote based directly on the delivered roadmap.
The ValidAI report includes: an overall score out of 100 broken down across 5 weighted areas, detailed scoring of 18 individual criteria with justification and concrete code extracts, a risk summary ranked by criticality level (Critical / Major / Minor), prioritised and actionable recommendations, a remediation roadmap with effort estimates per action. The report is delivered in Word + PDF format, accompanied by an oral debriefing session.
Yes, confidentiality is an absolute priority. An NDA is signed before any access. Code is shared exclusively via private Git repository. No copy is retained after the report is delivered. ValidAI is a service of MV Studio, a Belgian company subject to GDPR. Data processing is strictly limited to carrying out the commissioned audit, and no external subcontractor has access to your code.
Yes. Optionally after the audit, MV Studio can handle the remediation: fixing identified security vulnerabilities, architectural refactoring, automated test implementation. This is quoted separately based directly on the delivered roadmap — you know exactly what will be done and for how much. A 3-month follow-up session is also available at €500 to review the progress of corrections carried out by your team.